rs10505496 (PCAT1): Current Research Evidence
Key takeaways
- The only available study for rs10505496 enrolled just 2,246 adults and found no genome-wide significant hit for this specific variant.
- The research examined cognitive traits including memory, language, executive function, and visuospatial ability in a rural South African population.
- A different variant (rs73485231) was the primary finding in the only available study - rs10505496 was not independently significant.
- Evidence for this variant is preliminary and has not been replicated in larger cohorts.
- No lifestyle factors have been linked to rs10505496 in the available study evidence.
Key takeaways
- The only available study for rs10505496 enrolled just 2,246 adults and found no genome-wide significant hit for this specific variant.
- The research examined cognitive traits including memory, language, executive function, and visuospatial ability in a rural South African population.
- A different variant (rs73485231) was the primary finding in the only available study - rs10505496 was not independently significant.
- Evidence for this variant is preliminary and has not been replicated in larger cohorts.
- No lifestyle factors have been linked to rs10505496 in the available study evidence.
What the research says One genome-wide association study of cognitive performance enrolled 2,246 adults from a rural South African community and tested approximately 14 million imputed genetic markers across five traits: total cognition score, verbal episodic memory, executive function, language, and visuospatial ability. The study's primary genome-wide significant finding was rs73485231 for episodic memory, while a window-based replication approach was used to assess previously reported variants across cognitive domains. rs10505496 was not reported as a genome-wide significant hit in the provided evidence; the source study carries no PMID in the available metadata, so no inline citation is included.
Reported associations
- Cognitive performance (South African cohort): The only available study investigated associations with five cognitive traits in 2,246 rural South African adults using data from the H3Africa genotyping array; no genome-wide significant association for rs10505496 was identified, and no effect size for this specific variant was reported.
Evidence quality The sole available study enrolled 2,246 participants, a sample size substantially smaller than the 50,000-plus participants typical of well-powered genome-wide studies for polygenic traits such as cognitive function. The study used imputed data derived from the H3Africa genotyping array (approximately 14 million markers) and applied a conventional genome-wide significance threshold of p < 5 x 10-8. No association for rs10505496 reached that threshold in the provided evidence. The evidence base for this variant is therefore preliminary, limited to a single under-powered study in one population, and lacks independent replication - meaning no firm conclusions about this variant's function or associations can be drawn from available sources.
Lifestyle considerations No lifestyle considerations on file for this variant.
Frequently asked questions
What is rs10505496?
rs10505496 is a genetic variant located near the PCAT1 gene. The available research evidence is limited to a single small exploratory genome-wide association study, and no genome-wide significant association for this specific variant has been reported.
What is the PCAT1 gene?
PCAT1 is the gene near which rs10505496 is located. The only available study evidence does not provide direct functional information about PCAT1 in the context of this specific variant.
Is rs10505496 linked to any health conditions?
Based on the available research, no genome-wide significant association between rs10505496 and any health trait was reported. The only available study examined cognitive performance in a small South African cohort and did not identify this variant as significant.
How strong is the evidence for rs10505496?
The evidence is preliminary. Only one study covering this variant was available, with approximately 2,246 participants - far fewer than the tens of thousands typically needed to reliably detect associations with complex traits. Independent replication in larger, diverse cohorts is needed before conclusions can be drawn.